SNS: Special Letter: Graphene and Global Warming

 

STRATEGIC NEWS SERVICE®

 

Weekly Report on

Technology and the Economy

 

16 Years Providing Weekly Foresight

 

The most accurate predictive letter in computing and telecommunications,
read by industry leaders worldwide.

 

SNS Subscriber Edition Volume 16, Issue 4 Week of January 28, 2013

 

***SNS***

Special Letter:

Graphene and Global Warming:

Hope and "Right Action"

in the Time of Peak Everything

 

 

 

In This Issue

 

 

Feature:

Special Letter:

Graphene and

Global Warming

 

What Is the Problem? or, The Legacy of Bubbles

We Are a Bubble

Bursting the Bubble of Denial

The Role of Graphene

Understanding

Graphene's Potential

A Cause for Hope

and "Right Action"

About the Author

 

Upcoming SNS Events

& Media Links

 

In Other House News...

 

How to Subscribe

May I Share This Newsletter?

About SNS

About the Publisher

Where's Mark?

 

 [Please open the .pdf attachment for best viewing.]

 

By Jon Myers

___

 

Description: fire-2013-logo-stack-400 (2)Register now for the SNS Future in Review Conference. Join us for our 11th year, when FiRe will again be held at the beautiful Montage Laguna Beach Hotel, May 21-24:

 

www.futureinreview.com

___

 

See "Upcoming SNS Events" below for details on all SNS programs and registrations.

 

If you'd like to be more involved in SNS events as one of our select partners or sponsors, please contact Sharon at: sam@stratnews.com or 435-649-3645.

 

 

 

 

 

Publisher's Note: It is often said that the average human being literally lacks the ability to comprehend second-order rates of change: straight lines, OK but increasing increases, no. That's too bad, as this is the shape of most human-caused problems. Worse, this shape, representing self-reinforcing problems, gets out of control much faster than do straight-line problems, often ending up in a veritable black hole from which there is no chance of solution.

 

Another issue most people face in understanding complex problems is quite direct: the solutions are also complex. And, it seems, most people are not very good at understanding, or supporting, solutions that have more than one moving part. 

 

This is exactly the case for solving the problem of Global Warming. Energy-based solutions alone (e.g., reduce coal burning, when possible) won't do it. We know from past work by the CTO Design Challenge results at FiRe that even a single set of answers isn't enough: there will need to be a set of transition ("good enough") solutions put into practice immediately, followed by a second set of solutions that are better yet.