| |||||||||||||||||
 |
_____ April in New York with SNS!
Sign Up Now for our 14th annual SNS Dinner in New York New year, new season, new month, new tilt - "Cars, Energy and Infrastructure: Returning to the elegant ... Lotte New York Palace Hotel With SNS CEO Mark Anderson and special guest Bill Ribaudo, Managing Partner, Digital Risk Venture Portfolio, Deloitte & Touche Register Now at www.stratnews.com/events/newyork-dinner/
Many thanks to SNS Gold Platinum Partner Oracle:
And to Deloitte for its generous sponsorship of this special evening:
If you're in the Seattle area next week, join Mark for his talk at the Keiretsu Family Office Network, Thursday at lunchtime, open to all - and/or at the SNS presentation table at Friday's Expo:
Publisher's Note: The most important issue in global security today is the threat posed to free and democratic nations that are tempted to install 5G communications backbones containing equipment made by the Chinese firm Huawei. Those politicians and business leaders (often in poorer and/or rural regions) who consciously trade off lower price (thanks to Chinese Communist Party subsidies) for their own national security are, provably, putting their nations - not to mention companies - at near-certain risk. As though this weren't bad enough, there has been a recent tendency among a few wealthier nations with strong Chinese export ties (in the face of a storm of Chinese threats and propaganda) to publicly question whether Huawei represents a security threat. While these objections seem a thin veil covering export greed, we thought it time to put the question of Huawei's true risk profile to rest. In this discussion, Evan Anderson, CEO of our INVNT/IP (www.invntip.com) consortium, provides a complete dossier on Huawei's extensive security risks. As the author of our cabinet-level briefing report "Theft Nation," featured on 60 Minutes in 2016 in "The Great Brain Robbery," its best-watched investigative segment ever, Evan is uniquely qualified to make this assessment. As he'll point out, there is no longer any "wiggle room" around this question. Country leaders willing to exchange national security for money should now be called out for what they are: traitors. - mra |
